Analysis of Electability, Capacity, Campaign Resources on the Chances of Elected Public Officials in the General Election Democracy Party
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/e2dvp861Keywords:
Campaign Resources , Bag Content, Capacity, Democracy Party, Electability, Electoral SuccessAbstract
This research delves into the multifaceted landscape of electoral success by examining the intertwined influences of electability, capacity, and campaign resources on the performance of public officials from the Democracy party. By adopting a multidimensional approach, this study seeks to contribute to the understanding of how these factors interact and shape candidates' outcomes in general elections. Through a combination of quantitative analysis and qualitative insights, this research uncovers intriguing patterns in the electoral arena. Likability emerges as a powerful driver of voter choices, showcasing a robust positive correlation between candidates' likability scores and their electoral success. This underscores the significance of personal connection and emotional resonance in swaying voter decisions. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the study finds no significant correlation between candidate capacity attributes and electoral outcomes. While capacity remains valued, its impact appears contingent on its alignment with other factors such as likability and strategic resource allocation. This challenges traditional notions of experience as the primary determiner of electoral victory. The research further reveals a moderate positive correlation between effective campaign resource allocation and electoral success. Candidates who judiciously allocate resources, particularly in media coverage and social media engagement, tend to achieve better outcomes. This highlights the strategic importance of resource optimization in influencing voter perceptions and preferences. These findings provide a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between electability, capacity, and campaign resources in the context of the Democracy party's electoral campaigns. The implications extend to strategic decision-making for the party, as well as contributing to the broader discourse on electoral dynamics and democratic representation. Looking ahead, this research suggests avenues for further exploration, inviting future studies to consider cross-cultural comparisons, technology's role, and the evolving nature of voter behavior in shaping electoral outcomesReferences
Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2004). Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 589–610.
Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why parties?: The origin and transformation of political parties in America. University of Chicago Press.
Anderson, C. J., & Mendes, S. M. (2006). Learning to lose: Election outcomes, democratic experience and political protest potential. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 91–111.
Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.
Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Univ of California Press.
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 571–597.
Bonardi, J.-P. (2011). Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9(3), 247–255.
Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496.
Boydstun, A. E., & Lawrence, R. G. (2020). When celebrity and political journalism collide: Reporting standards, entertainment, and the conundrum of covering Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. Perspectives on Politics, 18(1), 128–143.
Budge, I., Robertson, D., & Hearl, D. (1987). Ideology, strategy and party change: spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies. Cambridge University Press.
Burton, M. J., Miller, W. J., & Shea, D. M. (2015). Campaign craft: The strategies, tactics, and art of political campaign management. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Butler, D., Kavanagh, D., & McAllister, I. (1997). The British general election of 1992. Springer.
Butler, P., & Harris, P. (2009). Considerations on the evolution of political marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 9(2), 149–164.
Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67.
Chapp, C. B. (2012). Religious rhetoric and American politics: The endurance of civil religion in electoral campaigns. Cornell University Press.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. routledge.
Cowell-Meyers, K. B. (2014). The Social Movement as Political Party: The Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition and the Campaign for Inclusion. Perspectives on Politics, 12(1), 61–80.
Crenson, M. A., & Ginsberg, B. (2004). Downsizing democracy: How America sidelined its citizens and privatized its public. JHU Press.
Dahan, N. (2005). Can there be a resource-based view of politics? International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(2), 8–27.
Domínguez, J. I., & McCann, J. A. (1998). Democratizing Mexico: Public opinion and electoral choices. JHU Press.
Duhan, P. (2017). Influence of Social Media on the First Time Voters and Youth In Favour Of Bhartiya Janta Party.
Dumitrescu, D. (2009). Spatial visual communications in election campaigns: Political posters strategies in two democracies. The Ohio State University.
Elmuti, D., Minnis, W., & Abebe, M. (2005). Does education have a role in developing leadership skills? Management Decision, 43(7/8), 1018–1031.
Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. B. (2011). The Arab spring| Social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 18.
Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2013). Comparing election campaign communication. In The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 289–307). Routledge.
Funk, C. L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18, 1–24.
Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections. Univ of California Press.
Gastil, J., & Black, L. (2007). Public deliberation as the organizing principle of political communication research. Journal of Public Deliberation, 4(1).
Gastil, J., & Knobloch, K. (2019). Hope for democracy: How citizens can bring reason back into politics. Oxford University Press.
Gerber, A. (1998). Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 401–411.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Koc Michalska, K., & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: How social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society, 22(4), 585–594.
Gingerich, D. W. (2013). Political institutions and party-directed corruption in South America: Stealing for the team. Cambridge University Press.
Grofman, B. (2004). Downs and two-party convergence. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 7, 25–46.
Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.
Hillygus, D. S., & Jackman, S. (2003). Voter decision making in election 2000: Campaign effects, partisan activation, and the Clinton legacy. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 583–596.
Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton University Press.
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. Springer.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.
Jacobson, G. (2019). The electoral origins of divided government: Competition in US House elections, 1946-1988. Routledge.
Jacobson, G. C. (1978). The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 72(2), 469–491.
Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 527–553.
Johnson, C. (2018). Analyzing the Use and Influence of Various Media in United States Presidential Campaigning. Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the ….
Johnston, M. (2005). Political parties and democracy in theoretical and practical perspectives. National Democratic Institute For International Affairs.
Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (2018). Democracy and the cartelization of political parties. Oxford University Press.
KEllY, N., & AshiAGboR, Sefa. (2011). Political parties and democracy in theoretical and practical perspectives. National Democratic Institute (NDI).
Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Patrons, clients and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansisons of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 583–600.
Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford university press.
Lack, E. H. (2020). ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom. University of Leeds.
Lee, Y. (2009). Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Social Movements for Democratic Representation in Korea. Korea Observer, 40(1), 27.
Lees-Marshment, J. (2009). Marketing after the election: The potential and limitations of maintaining a market orientation in government. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 205–227.
Lees-Marshment, J. (2014). Political marketing: Principles and applications. Routledge.
Levitt, S. D. (1994). Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the US House. Journal of Political Economy, 102(4), 777–798.
Lichter, S. R., & Noyes, R. (1996). Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism. Rowman & Littlefield.
Lippmann, W. (2017). Public opinion. Routledge.
Maisel, L. S. (2022). American political parties and elections: A very short introduction (Vol. 169). Oxford University Press.
Masch, L., & Gabriel, O. W. (2020). How emotional displays of political leaders shape citizen attitudes: The case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. German Politics, 29(2), 158–179.
Mayer, N. (2019). The political impact of social insecurity in France. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 11(3), 646–691.
McCarthy, H. (2013). The British people and the League of Nations: democracy, citizenship and internationalism, c. 1918–45. In The British people and the League of Nations. Manchester University Press.
Mushaben, J. M. (2022). Against all odds: Angela Merkel, Ursula von der Leyen, Anngret Kramp-Karrenbauer and the German paradox of female CDU leadership. German Politics, 31(1), 20–39.
Newman, B. I., & Perloff, R. M. (2004). Political marketing: Theory, research, and applications. Handbook of Political Communication Research, 17–43.
Nincic, M. (1992). A sensible public: New perspectives on popular opinion and foreign policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(4), 772–789.
Noelle‐Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.
Norris, P. (2005). Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367.
O’Cass, A., & Voola, R. (2011). Explications of political market orientation and political brand orientation using the resource-based view of the political party. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(5–6), 627–645.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190.
Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(19), 8877–8882.
Pastor, R. A. (1999). The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research. Democratization, 6(4), 1–27.
Patch, J. (2019). Discordant Democracy: Noise, Affect, Populism, and the Presidential Campaign. Routledge.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
Peacock, C., Dugger, H., Fanelli, J. K., Harris, A. J., McLelland, J. B., & Richardson, L. A. (2021). Choosing a Candidate: Traits, Issues, and Electability. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(3), 540–557.
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2011). The elaboration likelihood model. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 224–245.
Raftery, A. E., Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. (1995). Hypothesis testing and model. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, 165–187.
Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1979). The elusive median voter. Journal of Public Economics, 12(2), 143–170.
Saltzer, S. (2022). A risk venture? Investigating the “electability” challenge for women candidates in US elections. University of Chicago.
Secen, S. (2022). Electoral competition dynamics and Syrian refugee discourses and policies in Germany and France. European Politics and Society, 1–25.
Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Siavelis, P. M. (2012). Pathways to power: Political recruitment and candidate selection in Latin America. Penn State Press.
Sieberer, U. (2020). Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. In The Impact of Legislatures (pp. 141–169). Routledge.
Smidt, H. (2020). Mitigating election violence locally: UN peacekeepers’ election-education campaigns in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 199–216.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 224–237.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2019). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. Oxford University Press.
Taylor, T. (2021). Imperative to Participate: Understanding African American Voter Turnout in High-Profile Elections with African American Candidates. Idaho State University.
Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 11, 497–520.
Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2014). New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. In Political Marketing in Retrospective and Prospective (pp. 103–127). Routledge.
Von Borzyskowski, I. (2019). The credibility challenge: How democracy aid influences election violence. Cornell University Press.
Wagner, A., Trimble, L., & Sampert, S. (2019). One smart politician: gendered media discourses of political leadership in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 52(1), 141–162.
Wahman, M., & Goldring, E. (2020). Pre-election violence and territorial control: Political dominance and subnational election violence in polarized African electoral systems. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 93–110.
Yannas, P. (2005). Political marketing in Greece is ready for take-off. Journal of Political Marketing, 4(1), 1–15.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Ziblatt, D. (2009). Shaping democratic practice and the causes of electoral fraud: The case of nineteenth-century Germany. American Political Science Review, 103(1), 1–21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Adams Cohen Robertson, Crenson Minnis, Hopkins Hogg, Jacob Son, Klandermans Clemen (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Sosial, Sains, Terapan dan Riset (Sosateris) is licensed under a 