Analyzing the Impact of Occupational Safety Programs on Work Productivity Using Fault Tree Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/c10g3861Keywords:
Fault Tree Analysis , Occupational Safety Program , Productivity Impact, Workplace Safety, Work ProductivityAbstract
This research delves into the intricate relationship between the implementation of an occupational safety program and its influence on work productivity within organizational settings. Employing fault tree analysis as a primary methodology, the study aims to scrutinize the efficacy of safety initiatives and delineate their direct correlation with productivity outcomes. Through a mixed-method approach integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses, the research examines the effectiveness of safety programs in mitigating workplace hazards and fostering a culture of safety. The fault tree analysis dissects causal factors, identifying critical pathways and root causes impacting work productivity. Findings reveal a symbiotic relationship between safety measures and productivity metrics. A well-executed safety program emerges as a catalyst for improved operational efficiency, employee engagement, and quality of work. The implications drawn from this study advocate for a paradigm shift, where safety initiatives are integrated strategically, nurturing an environment where safety and productivity coalesce seamlessly. This research contributes actionable insights for organizations to optimize safety measures, bolster productivity, and foster a culture where safety isn't just a priority but a fundamental value. Ultimately, the findings offer a compass guiding organizations towards a future where safety and productivity converge synergistically, shaping a landscape of sustained success and employee well-being.
References
Ahmad, S. (2013). Paradigms of quality of work life. Journal of Human Values, 19(1), 73–82.
Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. L. (1994). The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the United States. Cornell University Press.
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200.
Delery, J. E., & Roumpi, D. (2017). Strategic human resource management, human capital and competitive advantage: is the field going in circles? Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 1–21.
Dunjó Denti, J. (2010). New trends for conducting hazard & operability (HAZOP) studies in continuous chemical processes. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
Ehiagwina, F. O., Kehinde, O. O., Nafiu, A. S., Afolabi, L. O., & Olatinwo, I. (n.d.). Fault Tree Analysis and its Modifications as Tools for Reliability and Risk Analysis of Engineering Systems–An Overview. Journal Homepage: Www. Ijrpr. Com ISSN, 2582, 7421.
Goldman, S. L., & Nagel, R. N. (1993). Management, technology and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(1–2), 18–38.
Greasley, K., Bryman, A., Dainty, A., Price, A., Soetanto, R., & King, N. (2005). Employee perceptions of empowerment. Employee Relations, 27(4), 354–368.
Huang, Q., Xing, Y., & Gamble, J. (2019). Job demands–resources: A gender perspective on employee well-being and resilience in retail stores in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1323–1341.
Kaiser, B., Liggesmeyer, P., & Mäckel, O. (2003). A new component concept for fault trees. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software-Volume 33, 37–46.
Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & effect: using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance. Harvard Business Press.
Lapp, S. A., & Powers, G. J. (1977). Computer-aided synthesis of fault-trees. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 26(1), 2–13.
Loosemore, M., & Malouf, N. (2019). Safety training and positive safety attitude formation in the Australian construction industry. Safety Science, 113, 233–243.
Mansbridge, J. J. (1990). Beyond self-interest. University of Chicago Press.
Mauri, G. (2000). Integrating safety analysis techniques, supporting identification of common cause failures. University of York.
Memon, H., Ranathunga, G. M., Karunaratne, V. M., Wijayapala, S., & Niles, N. (2022). Sustainable Textiles in the Past “Wisdom of the Past: Inherited Weaving Techniques Are the Pillars of Sustainability in the Handloom Textile Sector of Sri Lanka.” Sustainability, 14(15), 9439.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. Lexington Books.
Nikolakis, N., Maratos, V., & Makris, S. (2019). A cyber physical system (CPS) approach for safe human-robot collaboration in a shared workplace. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 56, 233–243.
Petersen, P. E. (2003). The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century–the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 31, 3–24.
Rasmussen, J., & Suedung, I. (2000). Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency.
Smith, R., & Hawkins, B. (2004). Lean maintenance: reduce costs, improve quality, and increase market share. Elsevier.
Tamers, S. L., Chosewood, L. C., Childress, A., Hudson, H., Nigam, J., & Chang, C.-C. (2019). Total Worker Health® 2014–2018: the novel approach to worker safety, health, and well-being evolves. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 321.
Yousaf, S., Latif, M., Aslam, S., & Saddiqui, A. (2014). Impact of financial and non-financial rewards on employee motivation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(10), 1776–1786.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alex Christhoper, Dareen Dominic (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Vertex is licensed under a 