Innovative approaches to nuclear energy density optimization for enhanced power generation and waste minimization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/5jd0hm75Keywords:
Energy Density Optimization, Innovative Approaches, Molten Salt Reactor, Nuclear Energy, Waste MinimizationAbstract
Nuclear energy has emerged as a viable low-carbon option for electricity generation, but traditional reactor designs face challenges regarding energy density and nuclear waste management. This research explores innovative approaches to optimize nuclear energy density while minimizing long-term environmental impact through reduced waste production. The study compares a traditional Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with an advanced Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) as the innovative technology. The objectives are to maximize energy density and minimize nuclear waste. A multi-objective optimization model is formulated, incorporating safety, operational, and environmental constraints. Numerical results demonstrate that the MSR achieves a higher energy density (30 MW/kg) than the PWR (20 MW/kg) and produces less waste (0.2 kg/MW vs. 0.5 kg/MW). The research highlights the potential benefits of innovative nuclear technologies and emphasizes the importance of safety evaluations, regulatory considerations, and economic viability for practical implementation. Collaborative efforts and supportive policies are crucial to realizing a sustainable and low-carbon energy future through advanced nuclear solutionsReferences
Abderrahim, H. A. (2020). Realization of a new large research infrastructure in Belgium: MYRRHA contribution for closing the nuclear fuel cycle making nuclear energy sustainable. EPJ Web of Conferences, 246, 12.
Abrahamson, D. E. (1976). Environmental and social issues associated with the nuclear fuel cycle. In Energy and the Environment Cost-Benefit Analysis (pp. 178–196). Elsevier.
Adumene, S., Islam, R., Amin, M. T., Nitonye, S., Yazdi, M., & Johnson, K. T. (2022). Advances in nuclear power system design and fault-based condition monitoring towards safety of nuclear-powered ships. Ocean Engineering, 251, 111156.
Ahearne, J. F. (2000). Intergenerational issues regarding nuclear power, nuclear waste, and nuclear weapons. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 763–770.
Alcott, B. (2008). The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 64(4), 770–786.
Amponsah, N. Y., Troldborg, M., Kington, B., Aalders, I., & Hough, R. L. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 461–475.
Bergthorson, J. M. (2018). Recyclable metal fuels for clean and compact zero-carbon power. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 68, 169–196.
Brook, B. W., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2015). Key role for nuclear energy in global biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 29(3), 702–712.
Brown, N. R., Powers, J. J., Feng, B., Heidet, F., Stauff, N. E., Zhang, G., Todosow, M., Worrall, A., Gehin, J. C., & Kim, T. K. (2015). Sustainable thorium nuclear fuel cycles: A comparison of intermediate and fast neutron spectrum systems. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 289, 252–265.
Chiba, S., Wakabayashi, T., Tachi, Y., Takaki, N., Terashima, A., Okumura, S., & Yoshida, T. (2017). Method to reduce long-lived fission products by nuclear transmutations with fast spectrum reactors. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 13961.
Commission, S. D. (2006). The role of nuclear power in a low carbon economy.
Cooper, M. (2014). Small modular reactors and the future of nuclear power in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 161–177.
Corkhill, C., & Hyatt, N. (2018). Nuclear waste management. IOP Publishing Bristol, UK.
da Silva, R. C., de Marchi Neto, I., & Seifert, S. S. (2016). Electricity supply security and the future role of renewable energy sources in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 328–341.
Elsheikh, B. M. (2013). Safety assessment of molten salt reactors in comparison with light water reactors. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 63–70.
Forsberg, C. W. (2009). Sustainability by combining nuclear, fossil, and renewable energy sources. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51(1), 192–200.
Fripp, M. (2012). Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(11), 6371–6378.
Galperin, A., Reichert, P., & Radkowsky, A. (1997). Thorium fuel for light water reactors—reducing proliferation potential of nuclear power fuel cycle. Science & Global Security, 6(3), 265–290.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
Hilborn, R. C. (2000). Chaos and nonlinear dynamics: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Oxford university press.
Horvath, A., & Rachlew, E. (2016). Nuclear power in the 21st century: Challenges and possibilities. Ambio, 45, 38–49.
Humphrey, U. E., & Khandaker, M. U. (2018). Viability of thorium-based nuclear fuel cycle for the next generation nuclear reactor: Issues and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 97, 259–275.
Hussein, E. M. A. (2020). Emerging small modular nuclear power reactors: A critical review. Physics Open, 5, 100038.
Hussein, E. M. A. (2021). Small Modular Reactors: Learning from the Past. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, 7(3), 34508.
Ingersoll, D. T. (2009). Deliberately small reactors and the second nuclear era. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51(4–5), 589–603.
Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2011). Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1154–1169.
Kessides, I. N., & Kuznetsov, V. (2012). Small modular reactors for enhancing energy security in developing countries. Sustainability, 4(8), 1806–1832.
Kurniawan, T. A., Othman, M. H. D., Singh, D., Avtar, R., Hwang, G. H., Setiadi, T., & Lo, W. (2022). Technological solutions for long-term storage of partially used nuclear waste: A critical review. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 166, 108736.
Ledingham, K. W. D., McKenna, P., & Singhal, R. P. (2003). Applications for nuclear phenomena generated by ultra-intense lasers. Science, 300(5622), 1107–1111.
Maczulak, A. E. (2010). Renewable energy: sources and methods. Infobase Publishing.
Magisetty, R., & Cheekuramelli, N. S. (2019). Additive manufacturing technology empowered complex electromechanical energy conversion devices and transformers. Applied Materials Today, 14, 35–50.
McKinley, I. G. (1992). The management of long lived nuclear waste. Energy Policy, 20(7), 683–692.
Merk, B., Litskevich, D., Peakman, A., & Bankhead, M. (2019). IMAGINE-A disruptive change to nuclear or how can we make more out of the existing spent nuclear fuel and what has to be done to make it possible in the UK? Atw-International Journal For Nuclear Power, 64(6–7), 353–359.
Meyer, R. M., Coble, J. B., & Ramuhalli, P. (2013). Requirements for prognostic health management of passive components in advanced small modular reactors. 2013 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), 1–8.
Oka, Y., Koshizuka, S., Ishiwatari, Y., & Yamaji, A. (2010). Super light water reactors and super fast reactors: Supercritical-pressure light water cooled reactors. Springer Science & Business Media.
Park, J. H., Park, H. S., Kwon, J. G., Kim, T. H., & Kim, M. H. (2018). Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors. Energy, 160, 520–535.
Pastoor, K. J., Kemp, R. S., Jensen, M. P., & Shafer, J. C. (2021). Progress in uranium chemistry: driving advances in front-end nuclear fuel cycle forensics. Inorganic Chemistry, 60(12), 8347–8367.
Pearce, J. M. (2012). Limitations of nuclear power as a sustainable energy source. Sustainability, 4(6), 1173–1187.
Poinssot, C., Rostaing, C., Baron, P., Warin, D., & Boullis, B. (2012). Main results of the French program on partitioning of minor actinides, a significant improvement towards nuclear waste reduction. Procedia Chemistry, 7, 358–366.
Ramana, M. V. (2018). Technical and social problems of nuclear waste. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 7(4), e289.
Sadiq, M., Shinwari, R., Usman, M., Ozturk, I., & Maghyereh, A. I. (2022). Linking nuclear energy, human development and carbon emission in BRICS region: do external debt and financial globalization protect the environment? Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(9), 3299–3309.
Schreurs, M. A. (2013). Orchestrating a low-carbon energy revolution without nuclear: Germany’s response to the fukushima nuclear crisis. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14(1), 83–108.
Sehgal, B. R. (2011). Nuclear safety in light water reactors: severe accident phenomenology. Academic Press.
Serp, J., Allibert, M., Beneš, O., Delpech, S., Feynberg, O., Ghetta, V., Heuer, D., Holcomb, D., Ignatiev, V., & Kloosterman, J. L. (2014). The molten salt reactor (MSR) in generation IV: overview and perspectives. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 77, 308–319.
Serp, J., Poinssot, C., & Bourg, S. (2017). Assessment of the anticipated environmental footprint of future nuclear energy systems. Evidence of the beneficial effect of extensive recycling. Energies, 10(9), 1445.
Sheffield, R. L., & Pitcher, E. J. (2009). 1.1 Application of Accelerators in Nuclear Waste Management.
Suman, S. (2018). Hybrid nuclear-renewable energy systems: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 166–177.
Tanaka, S. (2012). Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power stations of TEPCO—outline & lessons learned—. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 88(9), 471–484.
Usman, M., & Radulescu, M. (2022). Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Science of The Total Environment, 841, 156662.
Vujić, J., Bergmann, R. M., Škoda, R., & Miletić, M. (2012). Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper? Energy, 45(1), 288–295.
Wei, M., Patadia, S., & Kammen, D. M. (2010). Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? Energy Policy, 38(2), 919–931.
Xue, X., Lin, D., & Li, Y. (2022). Low Tortuosity 3D‐Printed Structures Enhance Reaction Kinetics in Electrochemical Energy Storage and Electrocatalysis. Small Structures, 3(12), 2200159.
Yan, X., Yang, L., Zhang, X., & Zhan, W. (2017). Concept of an accelerator-driven advanced nuclear energy system. Energies, 10(7), 944.
Yue, X., Peng, M. Y.-P., Anser, M. K., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., & Zaman, K. (2022). The role of carbon taxes, clean fuels, and renewable energy in promoting sustainable development: How green is nuclear energy? Renewable Energy, 193, 167–178.
Zeman, A., Dytlewski, N., Mank, G., Mulhauser, F., Ridikas, D., Stanculescu, A., & Inozemtsev, V. (2012). IAEA activities on co-ordinated research of structural materials for advanced reactor systems. Structural Materials for Innovative Nuclear Systems (SMINS-2), 409.
Zohuri, B., & McDaniel, P. (2019). Advanced smaller modular reactors. Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muellner Gufler Kromp, Frechette Pascual Zambetakis, Wood Wood (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Vertex is licensed under a 