Advanced integration of stereotaxis and real-time MRI for precise and safe medical navigation: a future paradigm for minimally invasive interventions

Authors

  • Lorenzo Söderholm Raygo KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Swedia Author
  • Wojcieszynski Puder Tonutti KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Swedia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/x5n5be87

Keywords:

Medical Navigation, Minimally Invasive Interventions, Precise and Safe Medical Procedures, Real-time MRI, Stereotaxis

Abstract

Minimally invasive techniques have transformed medicine by improving patient outcomes and reducing invasiveness. Existing navigation methods, which use fluoroscopy or pre-operative imaging, lack real-time visualization and precision during complex surgeries. Fluoroscopy may also expose patients and medical staff to ionizing radiation. We propose enhanced stereotaxis and real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) integration to overcome these problems and improve minimally invasive intervention precision and safety. Stereotactic guiding and high-resolution real-time MRI imaging are combined in this research to improve medical navigation. The conceptual framework includes modeling the stereotactic system's magnetic field, real-time tracking of magnetic-sensored medical devices, and dynamic MRI imaging for continuous visibility throughout treatments. Stereotactic and MRI data can be fused for simultaneous vision and navigation, and adaptive path planning algorithms allow real-time targeting and avoidance of key structures. A simulated cardiac electrophysiology catheter ablation treatment shows the combined approach's potential benefits. Real-time adaptive navigation reduces radiation exposure and problems while targeting precisely. This research establishes a new medical navigation paradigm that improves precision, patient safety, and radiation exposure. This integrated method could revolutionize minimally invasive procedures across medical disciplines, despite limitations in patient-specific data integration and real-time algorithm development. This new navigation approach needs further research, validation, and clinical trials to confirm its feasibility and efficacy and improve medical patient care

References

Abdollahiyan, P., Oroojalian, F., & Mokhtarzadeh, A. (2021). The triad of nanotechnology, cell signalling, and scaffold implantation for the successful repair of damaged organs: An overview on soft-tissue engineering. Journal of Controlled Release, 332, 460–492.

Arts, M., Brand, R., van der Kallen, B., Lycklama à Nijeholt, G., & Peul, W. (2011). Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial. European Spine Journal, 20, 51–57.

BAKER Jr, H. L., BERQUIST, T. O. M. H., KISPERT, D. B., REESE, D. F., HOUSER, O. W., EARNEST IV, F., FORBES, G. S., & MAY, G. R. (1985). Magnetic resonance imaging in a routine clinical setting. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 60(2), 75–90.

Bang, J. Y., Hough, M., Hawes, R. H., & Varadarajulu, S. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence to reduce radiation exposure at fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures. Official Journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG, 115(4), 555–561.

Baumann, M., Krause, M., Overgaard, J., Debus, J., Bentzen, S. M., Daartz, J., Richter, C., Zips, D., & Bortfeld, T. (2016). Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine. Nature Reviews Cancer, 16(4), 234–249.

Black, P. M., Moriarty, T., Alexander III, E., Stieg, P., Woodard, E. J., Gleason, P. L., Martin, C. H., Kikinis, R., Schwartz, R. B., & Jolesz, F. A. (1997). Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery, 41(4), 831–845.

Brown, J. K., Singh, K., Dumitru, R., Chan, E., & Kim, M. P. (2018). The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery programs and their application in cardiothoracic surgery. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 14(2), 77.

Carpi, F., & Pappone, C. (2009). Stereotaxis Niobe® magnetic navigation system for endocardial catheter ablation and gastrointestinal capsule endoscopy. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 6(5), 487–498.

Chiumello, D., Chevallard, G., & Gregoretti, C. (2011). Non-invasive ventilation in postoperative patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine, 37, 918–929.

Cleary, K., & Peters, T. M. (2010). Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 12, 119–142.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.

Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D. D. (2012). Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1467–1484.

Feng, L., Tyagi, N., & Otazo, R. (2020). MRSIGMA: Magnetic Resonance SIGnature MAtching for real‐time volumetric imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 84(3), 1280–1292.

Frane, N., & Bitterman, A. (2020). Radiation safety and protection.

Furlow, B. (2011). Radiation protection in pediatric imaging. Radiologic Technology, 82(5), 421–439.

Garreffa, G., Carnı, M., Gualniera, G., Ricci, G. B., Bozzao, L., De Carli, D., Morasso, P., Pantano, P., Colonnese, C., & Roma, V. (2003). Real-time MR artifacts filtering during continuous EEG/fMRI acquisition. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 21(10), 1175–1189.

Gherardini, M., Mazomenos, E., Menciassi, A., & Stoyanov, D. (2020). Catheter segmentation in X-ray fluoroscopy using synthetic data and transfer learning with light U-nets. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 192, 105420.

Giordano, B. D., Baumhauer, J. F., Morgan, T. L., & Rechtine, G. R. (2008). Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation. Spine, 33(18), 1970–1976.

Grant, C. S., Thompson, G., Farley, D., & Van Heerden, J. (2005). Primary hyperparathyroidism surgical management since the introduction of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: Mayo Clinic experience. Archives of Surgery, 140(5), 472–479.

Gunduz, S., Albadawi, H., & Oklu, R. (2021). Robotic devices for minimally invasive endovascular interventions: a new dawn for interventional radiology. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 3(2), 2000181.

Hal, W. A., Straza, M. W., Chen, X., Mickevicius, N., Erickson, B., Schultz, C., Awan, M., Ahunbay, E., Li, X. A., & Paulson, E. S. (2020). Initial clinical experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases, primary liver malignancy, and pancreatic cancer with 4D-MRI based online adaptation and real-time MRI monitoring using a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac. PloS One, 15(8), e0236570.

Lamata, P., Ali, W., Cano, A., Cornella, J., Declerck, J., Elle, O. J., Freudenthal, A., Furtado, H., Kalkofen, D., & Naerum, E. (2010). Augmented reality for minimally invasive surgery: overview and some recent advances. Augmented Reality, 73–98.

Le Heron, J., Padovani, R., Smith, I., & Czarwinski, R. (2010). Radiation protection of medical staff. European Journal of Radiology, 76(1), 20–23.

Li, J., Wang, J., Li, J., Yang, X., Wan, J., Zheng, C., Du, Q., Zhou, G., & Yang, X. (2021). Fabrication of Fe3O4@ PVA microspheres by one-step electrospray for magnetic resonance imaging during transcatheter arterial embolization. Acta Biomaterialia, 131, 532–543.

Lima, E., Rodrigues, P. L., Mota, P., Carvalho, N., Dias, E., Correia-Pinto, J., Autorino, R., & Vilaca, J. L. (2017). Ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous kidney access made easy: first clinical experience with a novel navigation system using electromagnetic guidance (IDEAL Stage 1). European Urology, 72(4), 610–616.

Mack, M. J. (2001). Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. Jama, 285(5), 568–572.

Mohyeldin, A., Lonser, R. R., & Elder, J. B. (2016). Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided frameless stereotactic brain biopsy. Journal of Neurosurgery, 124(4), 1039–1046.

Najar-Céspedes, A. P., & de Jesús Fuentes-Martínez, E. (2023). Use of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in postmortem diagnostics. Imaging and Radiation Research, 3(1), 33–42.

Ouyang, J., Xie, A., Zhou, J., Liu, R., Wang, L., Liu, H., Kong, N., & Tao, W. (2022). Minimally invasive nanomedicine: nanotechnology in photo-/ultrasound-/radiation-/magnetism-mediated therapy and imaging. Chemical Society Reviews, 51(12), 4996–5041.

Park, Y., & Ha, J. W. (2007). Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine, 32(5), 537–543.

Peichl, P., Sramko, M., Cvek, J., & Kautzner, J. (2021). A case report of successful elimination of recurrent ventricular tachycardia by repeated stereotactic radiotherapy: the importance of accurate target volume delineation. European Heart Journal-Case Reports, 5(2), ytaa516.

Plastaras, C., Appasamy, M., Sayeed, Y., McLaughlin, C., Charles, J., Joshi, A., Macron, D., & Pukenas, B. (2013). Fluoroscopy procedure and equipment changes to reduce staff radiation exposure in the interventional spine suite. Pain Physician, 16(6), E731.

Ploussi, A., & Efstathopoulos, E. P. (2016). Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in radiology department. World Journal of Radiology, 8(2), 142.

Puder, M., Valim, C., Meisel, J. A., Le, H. D., De Meijer, V. E., Robinson, E. M., Zhou, J., Duggan, C., & Gura, K. M. (2009). Parenteral fish oil improves outcomes in patients with parenteral nutrition associated liver injury. Annals of Surgery, 250(3), 395.

Sitti, M., Ceylan, H., Hu, W., Giltinan, J., Turan, M., Yim, S., & Diller, E. (2015). Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(2), 205–224.

Tinguely, P., Paolucci, I., Ruiter, S. J. S., Weber, S., de Jong, K. P., Candinas, D., Freedman, J., & Engstrand, J. (2021). Stereotactic and robotic minimally invasive thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, 713685.

Tonutti, M., Elson, D. S., Yang, G.-Z., Darzi, A. W., & Sodergren, M. H. (2017). The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments and future directions. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 93(1097), 159–167.

Turc, G., Bhogal, P., Fischer, U., Khatri, P., Lobotesis, K., Mazighi, M., Schellinger, P. D., Toni, D., De Vries, J., & White, P. (2023). European Stroke Organisation (ESO)-European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 15(8), e8–e8.

Vitiello, V., Lee, S.-L., Cundy, T. P., & Yang, G.-Z. (2012). Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 6, 111–126.

Wojcieszynski, A. P., Rosenberg, S. A., Brower, J. V, Hullett, C. R., Geurts, M. W., Labby, Z. E., Hill, P. M., Bayliss, R. A., Paliwal, B., & Bayouth, J. E. (2016). Gadoxetate for direct tumor therapy and tracking with real-time MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy of the liver. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 118(2), 416–418.

Xu, D., Han, S., Wang, C., Zhu, K., Zhou, C., & Ma, X. (2021). The technical feasibility and preliminary results of minimally invasive endoscopic-TLIF based on electromagnetic navigation: a case series. BMC Surgery, 21(1), 1–9.

Zhang, L., Sanagapalli, S., & Stoita, A. (2018). Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 24(19), 2047.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Advanced integration of stereotaxis and real-time MRI for precise and safe medical navigation: a future paradigm for minimally invasive interventions. (2023). Vertex, 12(2), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.35335/x5n5be87

Similar Articles

1-10 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.