Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the Acceptance of Smartboards in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/f8fpy424Keywords:
Intention to use, Perceived Usefulness, Smartboard,, Technology Acceptance ModelAbstract
The use of Smartboards in primary school learning has become an essential part of digital transformation in Indonesian education. However, the success of this implementation strongly depends on user acceptance. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing Smartboard acceptance using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which includes Perceived Usefulness (PU), Attitude Toward Using (ATU), and Intention to Use (IU). A quantitative explanatory correlational design was employed, involving primary school teachers in West Jakarta who have used Smartboards in classroom instruction. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The findings indicate that all indicators of PU, ATU, and IU demonstrate valid and reliable loading factor values. Structurally, PU has a positive and significant effect on IU, and ATU also shows a significant positive influence on IU. These results highlight that perceived usefulness and positive attitudes are the primary determinants shaping teachers’ intention to use Smartboard technology. The study implies that enhancing digital competencies, providing structured Smartboard training, and ensuring technical support are crucial to optimizing the implementation of Smartboard-based learningReferences
Aini, D. N., Pratama, A. R., & Rinanda, P. D. (2024). Comparison of TOPSIS and SMARTER Methods in Selecting Delivery Services. 1(February), 30–40.
Alawiah, E. T., & Putri, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Metode TOPSIS Pada Penerima Bantuan Sosial Akibat Covid19 di Desa Kota Batu Ciomas Bogor. Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika (J-SAKTI), 5(1), 72–82. https://tunasbangsa.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jsakti/article/view/299
Alawiah, E. T., & Sefrika, S. (2020). Decision Support System for Provision of Natural Disaster Victim Logistic Assistance With Topsis Method. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 2(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v2i2.118
Alawiah, E. T., Sefrika, S., & Siregar, M. H. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Instrumen Investasi Bagi Individu Dengan Metode Topsis. IJCIT (Indonesian Journal on Computer and Information Technology), 5(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.31294/ijcit.v5i1.6596
Alawiah1, Enok Tuti; Mardewi, T. S. et al. (2023). Decision support systems to choose the type of tourist object that are opened after covid 19 pandemic using TOPSIS method. AIP Conference Proceedings, December 2023.
Ardiansah, T. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode WASPAS dalam Pemilihan Calon Ketua Komite Sekolah. 2(1), 50–58.
Aripradono, H. W., Studi, P., Informasi, T., Komputer, F. I., Batam, U. I., & Mada, J. G. (2023). Analisa Extended Technology Acceptance Model Sebagai Penerimaan Penggunaan Platform Startup Education Technology The Analysis of Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Understand use of Platform at Education Technology Startup. 12, 425–437.
Ausat, A. M. A., Astuti, E. S., & W. (2022). Analysis Of Factors That Influence On E-Commerce Adoption And Their Impacts For Sme Performance In Subang District. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), 9, 333–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.202295422
Ayassy, B. M., Hidayatullah, C., Pratama, Y., Hadimulya, I., & Anshor, A. H. (2025). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN REWARD KARYAWAN DALAM MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOPSIS. 9(1), 1725–1729.
Belabcir, S. (2025). The Usefulness of Interactive Whiteboards in EFL Language Centers: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach. American Journal of Education and Technology (AJET), 4(4), 28–36.
Beldad, A. D., & Hegner, S. M. (2018). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model with the Inclusion of Trust, Social Influence, and Health Valuation to Determine the Predictors of German Users’ Willingness to Continue using a Fitness App: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(9), 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1403220
Choirina, P., Tjiptady, B. C., Fadliana, A. F., Rohman, M., Wahyudi, F., & Darajat, Pangestuti P. (2022). Peningkatan Marketing UMKM Dengan Pelatihan Desain Grafis Untuk Karang Taruna Desa Plandi, Kecamatan Wonosari, Kabupaten Malang. I-Com: Indonesian Community Journal, 2(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.33379/icom.v2i1.1195
Damayanti, S., Widjaja, F. N., Tedjakusuma, A. P., Bisnis, F., & Surabaya, U. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi ( JURKAMI ) PENGARUH WEBSITE DESIGN E-COMMERCE HOME PRODUCT TERHADAP CUSTOMER SATISFACTION DI INDONESIA Corresponding Author Email : fitri@staff.ubaya.ac.id The rapid growth of E-commerce in Indonesia has changed consumer shoppin. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JURKAMI), 10(01).
Eniyati, S. (2011). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa dengan Metode SAW ( Simple Additive Weighting ). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, 16(2), 171–177.
Faizal, L. (2025). Implementasi Metode TOPSIS pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru di SMKN 10 Bulukumba. 8(April).
Fauziah, L. N., Hermawati, M., Studi, P., Informatika, T., Gedong, K., Rebo, P., & Timur, J. (2025). TERBAIK PT TOPANSAMA JAYAPERKASA MENGGUNAKAN. 06(02), 456–465.
Fitroti, F., Saliman, S., Widiastuti, A., & Wijayanti, A. T. (2025). Optimization of Moodle-based Learning Management System in Sociology Learning : A Differentiated Approach Analysis. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 4(2), 528–542. https://doi.org/10.46843/jpm.v4i2.472
Krisnawan, M. N., Swanjaya, D., & Ramadhani, R. A. (2025). Pemilihan Bakal Calon Ketua IPNU Menggunakan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Penentuan Peringkat Calon yang Objektif. 4, 166–174.
Librado, D., & Prabawa, T. (2024). Analisis Komparatif Klasterisasi Penerima Bantuan Sosial Menggunakan Metode Topsis Dan Saw Comparative Analysis of Social Assistance Recipient Clustering Using the Topsis and Saw Methods. 2, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.26798/jiko.v8i2.1308
Maisya, I., Risqina, M. Z., & Saputra, A. (n.d.). Penentuan E-Commerce Yang Terbaik Untuk Belanja Online Menggunakan Metode Weight Product Pendahuluan Landasan Teori. 7–12.
Marudut, V., Siregar, M., Sinaga, K., Sirait, E., Manalu, A., Purba, A. T., Komputer, T., Indonesia, P. B., Akuntansi, K., & Indonesia, P. B. (2024). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan tenaga pendidik terbaik menggunakan metode complex proportional assessment. 7, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.37600/tekinkom.v7i1.1258
Ndwandwe, K. P., Ramaligela, M. S., & Mtshali, T. I. (2024). Smartboard enhanced creativity in the technology classroom: lessons on mechanical systems and control. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 30(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v30i1.72289
Nur Rahmi Akbarini. (2024). Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Explain Teachers’ Adoption of Digital Technology in Business Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 57(2), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v57i2.74301
Nurkhofifah, F. I. (2022). Penggunaan Media Smartboard dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2701–2709. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2489
Pitaloka, R. F., Santi, I. H., Febrinita, F., Informatika, T., Balitar, U. I., Sananwetan, K., Blitar, K., Indonesia, P., Keputusan, S. P., & Barang, J. P. (2023). PENENTUAN JASA PENGIRIMAN BARANG ONLINE TERBAIK. JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika), 7(5), 3376–3383.
Pradana, H. R., Retno, A., Hayati, T., Hamdana, E. N., Bisnis, S. I., Malang, P. N., Malang, K., Timur, J., & Keputusan, S. P. (2025). PENILAIAN E-COMMERCE TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE. 9(1), 1537–1544.
Putri, D. A., Alawiah, E. T., & Informatika, B. S. (2021). Decision Support System To Choose The Best Social Media Platform For Product Marketing Using Topsis Method. 5(36), 394–399.
Putri, N. A. (2025). Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan dengan Metode TOPSIS Berbasis Web Implementation of a Position Promotion Decision Support System Using the Web-Based TOPSIS Method. 14(105), 99–108.
Rahayu, M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Using SmartBoard Interactive Toward Learning Innovation in Schools. JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi, 19(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.21009/jiv.1901.3
Ramadhan, R. F., Mayor, J., No, S., Kedungwaru, K., & Tulungagung, K. (2023). Implementasi dan Analisis Metode MOORA dan SMART pada pemilihan Platform Jual Beli Online menggunakan Decision Support System Implementation and Analysis of the MOORA and SMART Methods in choosing an Online Buying and Selling Platform using a Decision Sup. 12(148), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.34010/komputika.v12i1.9300
Ramadhan, R. F., Teguh, A., Almais, W., Kusuma, S. F., & Mukminna, H. (2024). Perancangan Decision Support System Pemilihan Platform Jual Beli Online sebagai Media Transaksi Ekonomi. 4.
Ridho, A., & Listiana, N. (2024). Implementasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Social Commerce terbaik bagi UMKM. 8(4), 1160–1171.
Sefriani, R., Zefriyenni, & Rina Sepriana. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model: the use of E-Study Aplications in E-Learning. Journal of Education Technology, 6(4), 704–710. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i4.45457
Sefrika. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penggunaan Uang Elektronik Untuk Belanja Retail Dengan Metode TOPSIS. (Indonesian Journal on Computer and Information Technology, 6(November 2020), 25–30.
Sholihah, U. D., Pendidikan, S., Sekolah, G., Islam, U., & Ulama, N. (2025). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SMARTBOARD TERHADAP. 15(2), 99–106.
Simaremare, E., Mukaromah, S., & Wulansari, A. (2024). Evaluasi Kepuasan Penggunaan Learning Management System Canvas Pada Mahasiswa Msib Menggunakan Model Tam Dan Model Issm. Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknik Elektro Terapan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.23960/jitet.v12i3.4918
Sudarman, Kezia Grace Sudarman; Rochmoeljati, R. (2025). Implementation of TOPSIS in Strategic Management for Selecting the Best Airline : Case Study of PT XYZ. Jati Emas (Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat), 9(1), 71–76.
Sulaiman, T. T., Mahomed, A. S. B., Rahman, A. A., & Hassan, M. (2023). Understanding Antecedents of Learning Management System Usage among University Lecturers Using an Integrated TAM-TOE Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031885
Susanto, Y., Sumiatie, & Susanto, D. T. M. (2025). Pemanfaatan Smartboard sebagai Media Interaktif untuk Analisis Sumber Sejarah Visual dalam Penguatan Historical Thinking Skills Siswa SMAN 2 Palangka Raya. Nirwasita: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Ilmu Sosial, 6(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.59672/nirwasita.v6i2.5399
Winayu, I. M. (2024). The Use of Digital Smart Boards as a Means of Supporting TPACK-Based Interactive Learning. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 3(2), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i2.316
Zhao, W., Baharom, S. B., & Razak, N. A. (2024). Factors Impacting Teachers’ Behavioral Intention to Use the Interactive Whiteboard in Hebei, China. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(4), 588–595. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2081
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ririn Restu Aria, Helina Apriyani, Enok Tuti Alawiah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Vertex is licensed under a 