Exploring Community Perceptions of Traditional Becak and Modern Mobility in Indonesian Transportation: Balancing Cultural Heritage and Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/6s6jva96Keywords:
Becak and Modern Services, Community Engagement, Heritage in Transportation, Cultural, Transportation PerceptionsAbstract
This research investigates the diverse array of community perceptions surrounding transportation in Indonesia, particularly concerning the coexistence of traditional modes, notably the iconic becak, and the emergence of modern transportation services exemplified by platforms like Go-Jek. Through a comprehensive exploration of community sentiments, this study unravels a complex tapestry of viewpoints, revealing contrasting attitudes towards preserving cultural heritage and embracing technological advancements. The research illuminates the sentiments of different community segments, wherein one faction advocates ardently for the preservation of traditional transportation, emphasizing the cultural significance and historical legacy embedded within the becak. Conversely, another segment gravitates towards the convenience, efficiency, and technological allure of modern transportation options, illustrating the allure of innovation in a rapidly evolving urban landscape. The findings of this research underscore the need for a delicate balance a balance between preserving tradition and embracing innovation. They underscore the significance of navigating towards a transportation landscape that harmonizes traditional values with technological advancements. Ultimately, this study presents a roadmap for transportation development in Indonesia that respects cultural heritage, caters to diverse community needs, and paves the way for a transportation ecosystem where tradition and innovation coexist harmoniously.References
Barker, J., & Gibbings, S. L. (2018). Cultures and politics of Indonesian infrastructures. Indonesia, 105(1), 1–17.
Chovanec, J. (2013). Written academic discourse in English: From local traditions to global outreach. Brno Studies in English, 38(2), 5–16.
Dhanorkar, S., & Burtch, G. (2022). The heterogeneous effects of P2P ride-hailing on traffic: Evidence from Uber’s entry in California. Transportation Science, 56(3), 750–774.
Dinh, H. T., Palmade, V., Chandra, V., & Cossar, F. (2012). Light manufacturing in Africa: Targeted policies to enhance private investment and create jobs. World Bank Publications.
Finney, S. S., Mostafanezhad, M., Pigliasco, G. C., & Young, F. W. (2015). At home and in the field: Ethnographic encounters in Asia and the Pacific islands. University of Hawaii Press.
Kallis, G., Paulson, S., D’Alisa, G., & Demaria, F. (2020). The case for degrowth. John Wiley & Sons.
Kibaroğlu, O. (2019). Street Smart Technology: Grab and GoJek.
Mateo-Babiano, I., Recio, R. B., Ashmore, D. P., Guillen, M. D., & Gaspay, S. M. (2020). Formalising the jeepney industry in the Philippines–A confirmatory thematic analysis of key transitionary issues. Research in Transportation Economics, 83, 100839.
Mooney, G. (1999). Urban ‘disorders.’ Unruly Cities? Order/Disorder, 49–95.
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). 10 sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
Oviedo, D., Perez Jaramillo, D., & Nieto, M. (2021). Governance and Regulation of Ride-hailing Services in Emerging Markets: Challenges, Experiences and Implications.
Pluye, P., García Bengoechea, E., Granikov, V., Kaur, N., & Tang, D. L. (2018). A world of possibilities in mixed methods: review of the combinations of strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative phases, results and data.
Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2017). The urban transport crisis in emerging economies: An introduction. Springer.
Rogerson, C. (2000). Local economic development in an era of globalisation: The case of South African cities. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 91(4), 397–411.
Salam, U., Lee, S., Fullerton, V., Yusuf, Y., Krantz, S., & Henstridge, M. (2018). Indonesia case study: Rapid technological change–challenges and opportunities. Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series.
Singh, B. P. (2017). The 21st century: geopolitics, democracy and peace. Taylor & Francis.
Skocpol, T., & Somers, M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 174–197.
Tabor, S. (1982). Becak Drivers: The Plight of A Poor Group in Urban Indonesia.
Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 938–953.
Thynell, M. (2009). Social change and urban transport. Transport Policy Advisory Series, 2.
Trask, B. (2009). Globalization and families: Accelerated systemic social change. Springer Science & Business Media.
Whitelegg, J. (1997). Critical mass: transport, environment and society in the twenty-first century. Pluto press.
Wijaya, S. E., & Imran, M. (2019). Moving the Masses: Bus-Rapid Transmit (BRT) Policies in Low Income Asian Cities. Springer.
Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, A. (2021). Master planning and the evolving urban model in the Gulf cities: Principles, policies, and practices for the transition to sustainable urbanism. Planning Practice & Research, 36(2), 193–215.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Litania Simbolon, Jibrily jibrily, Meylinda Rajagukguk (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Sosial, Sains, Terapan dan Riset (Sosateris) is licensed under a 